<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="weebly" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >

<channel><title><![CDATA[TrailStompers.com: San Francisco Bay Area Trail Running - Stompin' Blog]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/stompin-blog.html]]></link><description><![CDATA[Stompin' Blog]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:13:38 -0800</pubDate><generator>Weebly</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Finally ran the re-routed White Oak Trail in Monte Bello OSP]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/finally-ran-the-re-routed-white-oak-trail-in-monte-bello-osp.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/finally-ran-the-re-routed-white-oak-trail-in-monte-bello-osp.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:20:05 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/finally-ran-the-re-routed-white-oak-trail-in-monte-bello-osp.html</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, so this isn't "hot off the press" news, but last year the Open Space District completed a project to re-route the upper mile of the White Oak Trail in Monte Bello Open Space Preserve.&nbsp; We finally ran it today and must report that they did an excellent job.&nbsp; The old trail was an impossibly steep, rutted, exposed, and wide trail.&nbsp; The new trail is shaded and switchbacks were added to make the climb much more enjoy [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">OK, so this isn't "hot off the press" news, but last year the Open Space District completed a project to re-route the upper mile of the White Oak Trail in Monte Bello Open Space Preserve.&nbsp; We finally ran it today and must report that they did an excellent job.&nbsp; The old trail was an impossibly steep, rutted, exposed, and wide trail.&nbsp; The new trail is shaded and switchbacks were added to make the climb much more enjoyable.&nbsp; They also replaced the horrible "fire break next to Page Mill Road" section with a narrow singletrack through grassland with great views.&nbsp; This new trail gets two thumbs up!!<br /></div>  <div ><div style="text-align: center;"><a href='http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/5657586_orig.jpg?367' rel='lightbox' onclick='if (!lightboxLoaded) return false'><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/5657586.jpg?367" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">Click on the map for full size image</div></div></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gear Review: Nathan HPL #020 Hydration Vest]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/gear-review-nathan-hpl-020-hydration-vest.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/gear-review-nathan-hpl-020-hydration-vest.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:21:22 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/07/gear-review-nathan-hpl-020-hydration-vest.html</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, I have to be honest: I hate wearing or carrying things while running.&nbsp; The longer the distance, the more it bugs me.&nbsp; The first time I tried carrying hand-bottles I wanted to throw them in the woods after 5 miles.&nbsp; I tried my old Camelbak and it felt like I was giving a piggy-back ride to a fidgety 5-year-old child that had filled up on Slurpees. &nbsp; I put up with a waist-belt on long runs because it seems li [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">OK, I have to be honest: I hate wearing or carrying things while running.&nbsp; The longer the distance, the more it bugs me.&nbsp; The first time I tried carrying hand-bottles I wanted to throw them in the woods after 5 miles.&nbsp; I tried my old Camelbak and it felt like I was giving a piggy-back ride to a fidgety 5-year-old child that had filled up on Slurpees. &nbsp; I put up with a waist-belt on long runs because it seems like the lesser of a few evils.&nbsp; However, prompted by a solo 30-mile run I was planning for last weekend, I finally broke down and blew $80 on a Nathan HPL #020 hydration vest.&nbsp; I have to say that this little pack has changed my mind about hydration packs.<br /></div>  <span class='imgPusher' style='float:right;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: right; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:right;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/1118847.jpg" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span> <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">First and foremost, this thing is darn comfortable.&nbsp; Even when the bladder is full (2 liters) and the pack is crammed with PowerBars, the suspension system makes the load almost unnoticeable.&nbsp; Honestly.&nbsp; I didn't believe it either, until the end of the 30-miler when I realized that I had absolutely no chafing or discomfort from this pack.&nbsp; One major reason for this is that the straps are highly adjustable for the perfect fit.&nbsp; Also, the chest strap has just enough elastic built in such that the strap expands with your breathing.&nbsp; You don't feel confined or "strapped in."&nbsp; <span></span><br /></div> <hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr>  <span class='imgPusher' style='float:left;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: left; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:left;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/1717584.jpg" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span> <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">Now here's the really cool part.&nbsp; The front of the pack is a full-fledged Nathan running vest.&nbsp; It has very useful pockets and pouches that are easily accessible while running.&nbsp; Although the little pockets look small, I was easily able to fit the following: 1 Blackberry smartphone, 3 GU's, and 2 PowerBars.&nbsp; (This is in addition to the storage in the rear pack.)&nbsp; Also, the drinking tube clips in to the chest strap when not in use so you don't have to deal with the mouthpiece banging against your chest the entire run.&nbsp; Speaking of the drinking tube, another nice feature is that you can route the tube over either shoulder, in order to customize the pack for your liking.<br /><br /><span>One thing I should note: There is not that much storage capacity in this pack.&nbsp; If you want to carry along a change of clothes, extra pair of shoes, and a Subway footlong, this pack is not for you.&nbsp; However, Nathan now has a complete line of packs, from tiny minimal packs to larger daypacks.</span><br /><br /><span>Overall I highly recommend this pack if you are looking for a new accessory to extend your runs.&nbsp; For more information, visit: </span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nathansports.com/">www.nathansports.com</a>.</div> <hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Back on the Poto]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/06/back-on-the-poto.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/06/back-on-the-poto.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:54:15 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/06/back-on-the-poto.html</guid><description><![CDATA[  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class='imgPusher' style='float:left;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: left; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:left;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/1808848.jpg" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span> <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">So I'm back in Michigan and I did the 18-mile Potawatomi Trail yesterday.&nbsp; According to SeriousRunning.com it's the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.seriousrunning.com/best/?s=10">23rd best trail run in the United States</a> .&nbsp; I don't know about that, but it is quite nice.&nbsp; Given that it's Michigan, there are no big hills.&nbsp; But, it is a shaded rolling singletrack through densely wooded forest.&nbsp; Luckily, it's shaded most of the way.&nbsp; Plus, there is a hand pump for water at about mile 11 or so.&nbsp; The only problem is that you have to deal with near head-on collisions from crazy mountain bikers. <br /><br /><span>If you're not up for the full 18-mile loop there are shorter loops as well, </span>ranging from a few miles up to the full 18-miles.&nbsp; There's also the 35-mile Pinckney-Waterloo trail, which would be a good challenge someday.<br /><br /><span>The trail is located in the Pinckney State Recreation Area.&nbsp; For more information check out the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/parksandtrails/Details.aspx?id=484&amp;type=SPRK">official website</a>.</span><br /><br /><br /><span></span><br /></div> <hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gear review: Brooks Adrenaline ASR 7]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/gear-review-brooks-adrenaline-asr-7.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/gear-review-brooks-adrenaline-asr-7.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:10:05 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/gear-review-brooks-adrenaline-asr-7.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Two words: "IMPULSE BUY".&nbsp; I hadn't planned on picking up a new pair of trail shoes, but they just looked so shiny and so downright, um, dare I say *sexy* sitting there at Sports Basement.&nbsp; And once I tried them on I knew I had to take them home. [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Two words: "IMPULSE BUY".&nbsp; I hadn't planned on picking up a new pair of trail shoes, but they just looked so shiny and so downright, um, dare I say *sexy* sitting there at Sports Basement.&nbsp; And once I tried them on I knew I had to take them home.<br /></div><span class='imgPusher' style='float:right;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: right; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:right;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/6628076.jpg?298" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px; border-width:0;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span><div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">Since I'm a dedicated Asics guy, I can't compare these shoes to any other previous Brooks models.&nbsp; But, once I tried them on, I made a few immediate observations:<br /></div><hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr><span class='imgPusher' style='float:left;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: left; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:left;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/1295498929.png" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:0;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span><div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; "><ol><li>Even though I bought the medium width (13D), they are definitely pretty narrow, especially at the forefoot.&nbsp; Now, for me that's perfect, because I have very narrow feet.&nbsp; However, I get the feeling that people with "normal" feet may need to get the "wide" version.</li><li>The shoes seem to be on the minimalist side.&nbsp; They are supportive, but lower-profile and much less cushy than other shoes.&nbsp; This makes them light and responsive, but some people might feel the impact from the trail more than they like.</li><li>The lacing system is great!&nbsp; They actually feel more snug and secure than my beloved Asics.<br /></li></ol></div><hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr><div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">But the real question is, how do they perform on the trail?&nbsp; Well, I've  put about 84 miles on these shoes (according to the trusty training log) including  one 20-miler.&nbsp; Here are my observations:<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PROS</span>:<ul style=""><li style="">This shoe does feel light and responsive!</li><li style="">The shoe's  lacing system and upper fit like a glove.&nbsp; No blisters or hot spots, and  pressure seems evenly distributed around the foot.</li><li style="">Personally, I like the lower-profile minimalist feel.<br /></li><li style="">They look really cool!</li></ul></div><span class='imgPusher' style='float:right;height:0px'></span><span style=' float: right; z-index: 10; position: relative; ;clear:right;margin-top:0px;*margin-top:0px'><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/1295499281.png" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px; border-width:0;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span><div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; display: block; "><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CONS:</span><br /><ul><li>The sole.&nbsp; Boy, it looks cool, doesn't it?&nbsp; However, the traction on wet rocks, roots, and wooden bridges is not very good, as compared to the Asics 2140/50/60 soles.&nbsp; I believe it is because of the harder rubber material used on the Brooks.&nbsp; It just doesn't grip very well on wet surfaces.&nbsp; Also, the deep grooves really collect mud and debris. <br /></li><li>The lower-profile minimalist feel.&nbsp; Yes, it's true that I also listed it as a "PRO" above.&nbsp; But, for some people it may be a "CON."&nbsp; After the 20-miler, my knees definitely ached more than they would with a more cushy shoe.<br /></li></ul></div><hr  style=" clear: both; visibility: hidden; width: 100%; "></hr><div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">The verdict?&nbsp; Overall, despite the negatives, I still love this shoe.&nbsp; It may not be the best shoe for the super long-distance ultra-runner, but it's a great shoe if you are looking for a more minimal, great-fitting shoe for 10-20 mile trail runs.&nbsp; And, it really looks cool...&nbsp; :)<br><br><span>-c</span><br></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[A study showing shoes = bad]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/a-study-showing-shoes-bad.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/a-study-showing-shoes-bad.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:04:51 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/a-study-showing-shoes-bad.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Here's a great study that was conducted on 2300 children between the ages of 4 and 13.&nbsp; The purpose was to determine if there was a link between wearing shoes and developing flat feet.&nbsp; The conclusions were:"...The incidence [of flat foot] among children who used footwear was 8.6% compared with 2.8% in those who did not ... Flat foot was most common in children who wore closed-toe shoes, less com [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Here's a great study that was conducted on 2300 children between the ages of 4 and 13.&nbsp; The purpose was to determine if there was a link between wearing shoes and developing flat feet.&nbsp; The conclusions were:<br /><br /><span>"...</span>The incidence [of flat foot] among children who used footwear was 8.6% compared with 2.8% in those who did not ... Flat foot was most common in children who wore closed-toe shoes, less common in those who wore sandals or slippers, and least in the unshod. Our findings suggest that shoe-wearing in early childhood is detrimental to the development of a normal<br />longitudinal arch...<br /><br /><a target="_blank" href="http://web.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/reprint/74-B/4/525.pdf">Click here</a> for the complete article!<br /><br /><span></span><br /></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[I'm back on the Vibram Five-Fingers!]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/im-back-on-the-vibram-five-fingers.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/im-back-on-the-vibram-five-fingers.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:00:55 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2011/01/im-back-on-the-vibram-five-fingers.html</guid><description><![CDATA[I just couldn't do it...&nbsp; I gave up the FF's after a tear in my right foot.&nbsp; But, after months of recovery, things are back to normal.&nbsp; And, barefoot running is just too fun.&nbsp; It's like being a kid again, just running around and having fun!&nbsp; But here are a few things I learned from my injury:If you feel a shooting pain in your foot - STOP!&nbsp; Don't run another 2 miles until the pain is exc [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">I just couldn't do it...&nbsp; I gave up the FF's after a tear in my right foot.&nbsp; But, after months of recovery, things are back to normal.&nbsp; And, barefoot running is just too fun.&nbsp; It's like being a kid again, just running around and having fun!&nbsp; But here are a few things I learned from my injury:<br /><ol><li>If you feel a shooting pain in your foot - STOP!&nbsp; Don't run another 2 miles until the pain is excruciating (like me...)</li><li>Be very careful when running in the Vibrams...&nbsp; Now I focus on track or road running with the Vibrams, or trails that are very smooth.&nbsp; I'm also more careful where I step.</li><li>Just don't push it too hard!</li></ol>Happy running!<br /></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibram Five Fingers: The end of a love affair...]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/08/vibram-five-fingers-the-end-of-a-love-affair.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/08/vibram-five-fingers-the-end-of-a-love-affair.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:23:32 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/08/vibram-five-fingers-the-end-of-a-love-affair.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, all good things have to come to an end.&nbsp; And three weeks ago, my love affair died.&nbsp; Well, it actually tore.&nbsp; It was a beautiful morning at Rancho, and I was out for a run with the Five-Fingers.&nbsp; About 2 miles into the run, something went haywire in my right foot.&nbsp; I had to walk back out, with excruciating pain shooting from the top of my foot all of the way up the back of my leg.&nbsp; The X-rays showed that nothi [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">Well, all good things have to come to an end.&nbsp; And three weeks ago, my love affair died.&nbsp; Well, it actually tore.&nbsp; It was a beautiful morning at Rancho, and I was out for a run with the Five-Fingers.&nbsp; About 2 miles into the run, something went haywire in my right foot.&nbsp; I had to walk back out, with excruciating pain shooting from the top of my foot all of the way up the back of my leg.&nbsp; The X-rays showed that nothing was broken, but some ligaments were obviously severely strained.&nbsp; The culprit?&nbsp; The damn Five-Fingers.&nbsp; When I went to see my doctor, he gave me the "I told you so" lecture, as previously he had told me that it wasn't prudent to run without proper shoes.&nbsp; <br /><br />And so it goes, and a love affair dies.&nbsp; Unfortunately, it is worse than a relationship break-up because I am left with physical damage as well as the emotional scars.&nbsp; Hopefully things will heal soon, but as for the Five-Fingers, they are off to the landfill to rot along with the Chia Pets, Cabbage Patch Dolls, Furbies, and other fads from a past generation...<br /></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moccasins for running]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/moccasins-for-running.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/moccasins-for-running.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 23:52:40 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/moccasins-for-running.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Today on the run I learned about a new [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span  style=" position: relative; float: right; z-index: 10; "><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/7310764.jpg" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">Today on the run I learned about a new minimalist running shoe: the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.softstarshoes.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&amp;Product_ID=1344">RunAmoc </a>from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.softstarshoes.com/">Soft Star Shoes</a>.&nbsp; This running moccasin is designed and handmade in Oregon, and comes in a road and trail version.&nbsp; Watch out Five-Fingers, the RunAmoc could be the next best thing since sliced bread!<br /><br />RunAmoc's can be ordered directly from Soft Star Shoes or from a local store.&nbsp; See the website for details.<br /></div><hr  style=" visibility: hidden; clear: both; width: 100%; "></hr>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Race Report: Quicksilver "55k"]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/race-report-quicksilver-55k.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/race-report-quicksilver-55k.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 19:38:29 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/05/race-report-quicksilver-55k.html</guid><description><![CDATA[What is the Quicksilver "55k", you may  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span  style=" position: relative; float: left; z-index: 10; "><a><img src="http://www.trailstompers.com/uploads/2/6/8/6/2686411/5480234.jpg" style="margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; border-width:1px;padding:3px;" alt="Picture" class="galleryImageBorder" /></a><div style="display: block; font-size: 90%; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"></div></span><div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; display: block; ">What is the Quicksilver "55k", you may ask?&nbsp; Is it a new event?&nbsp; Well, sort-of.&nbsp; Let's just say that today I unintentionally ran the longest distance of my life because of two unicyclists...<br /><br />The day started out quite early.&nbsp; I woke up at 3 am and, realizing that I had get up at 4 am, couldn't get back to sleep.&nbsp; So I hung out in bed until NPR started blaring at 4 am.&nbsp; Some interview with Craig (from Craigslist) and another guy trying to educate women around the globe.&nbsp; Admirable.&nbsp; I got up, went through the morning ritual, and ate some PBJ.&nbsp; Out the door at 4:50, I headed down to Almaden to meet Bill at 5:15 a few blocks from Almaden Quicksilver.&nbsp; We made it to the park a little after 5:20 and managed to snag the third-to-the-last parking spot.&nbsp; At this point, there was only the faint glow of morning on the horizon.&nbsp; We picked up our numbers and then I set off to wait in the bathroom line.&nbsp; Seriously, who only puts one stall in a bathroom?? It was soon 5:45, and time to get ready.&nbsp; We lined up at about 5:55 and then 10..9..8..7..6..5..4..3..2..1..GO!<br /><br />The first few miles of the race are brutal.&nbsp; You run up about 1000 feet very steeply, and then descend almost all of the way back to the car.&nbsp; But, it wasn't too bad as Bill and I held a pretty easy pace.&nbsp; It was then on to the New Almaden Trail, about 6 miles of challenging rolling singletrack.&nbsp; I soon found myself alone and cranked up the iPod.&nbsp; I was just starting to get a queasy feeling in my stomach and question why I was doing this when I happened to start listening to a new episode of RadioLab.&nbsp; Coincidentally enough, the topic was people who push themselves to their limits.&nbsp; They interviewed some IronMan finishers, Race Across America (3000-mile bike race) finishers, and other six-sigma people.&nbsp; Needless to say, this gave me just the kick-in-the-butt that I needed!&nbsp; I had soon reached the end of the New Almaden Trail and the other end of the park.&nbsp; The stomach was still a bit queasy but just then I remembered the TUMS that I had brought along.&nbsp; This was my first time trying TUMS during a race and just let me say, I'm hooked.&nbsp; I popped one or two every 30 minutes or so for the rest of the race to keep the stomach under control. Highly recommended! After a moderate climb, the race then turned onto the Randol Trail, which is one of the flattest trails in the park (comparatively speaking, that is) and I was soon at the halfway point.&nbsp; My time was well under 3 hours, and I started getting excited for a decent finish.&nbsp; The race then turned up to begin the next climb.&nbsp; Sadly, this is where things went terribly wrong...<br /><br />As I was climbing up the trail, I came up behind two mountain-unicyclists.&nbsp; Yes, you read correctly.&nbsp; These two people apparently felt that having two wheels was for pansies and were unicycling up one of the harder climbs in the park.&nbsp; As I continued up the trail, I was gawking at the unique sight along with another runner, who I later found is a serious ultra-runner named Donald who was doing the 50-mile.&nbsp; He pulled out his camera and snapped a couple of pictures of the one-wheeled-weeble-wobblers.&nbsp; Soon after, we passed by an aid station that was just being set up.&nbsp; Hmmm, that was a bit strange, but - oh look - another arrow on the trail so I guess everything is OK.&nbsp; The arrows then guided us onto the Yellow Kid Trail which I again throught was strange because I didn't remember seeing that on the map.&nbsp; After a few-hundred foot climb, the trail flattened out by the old ore furnace.&nbsp; At this point the conversation went something like this:<br /><br />Donald: "Have you run this race before?"<br /><br />Carl: "No, but I've run here a lot.&nbsp; Why?"<br /><br />Donald: "I think they changed the route this year.&nbsp; I don't remember this from last year."<br /><br />Carl: "Well I know that we don't go by Bull Run until later so this is probably right" (Man am I dumb)<br /><br />Donald: "Oh OK".<br /><br />We continued descending for another 5 minutes or so, then started climbing.&nbsp; At this point Donald uttered the amazingly insightful words:<br /><br />"There are no runners anywhere!"<br /><br />With these words I actually stopped, looked around, and yes, even though we could see for miles in every direction, there were definitely no runners anywhere in sight.&nbsp; Oh $#%^, we're on the Hicks Road out-and-back, which the 50-milers would do later in the day.&nbsp; This explains the aid station that was just being set up!!&nbsp; There was no choice but to turn around and backtrack.&nbsp; As we backtracked, I was at a loss as to where we could have gone wrong...&nbsp; I was attentively searching for arrows the whole time... except...&nbsp; OH NO!!!&nbsp; The UNICYCLISTS!!!&nbsp; Sure enough, after about 10-15 minutes of backtracking we saw the turn at the exact spot where we were gawking at the one-wheelers!!&nbsp; (I blame all unicyclists for this and will never attend another circus.) &nbsp;<br /><br />The rest of the run was rather uneventful: a 1000-foot climb here, a GU there, some water here, a descent there, a TUMS here, a 1500-foot climb there.&nbsp; Miles 28-30 (31-33 for me) are a series of very steep climbs, followed by a steep downhill to the finish!<br /><br />The result: 34.5 miles in 5:45.&nbsp; At that pace I would have done the 50k in 5:15.&nbsp; GRRR!&nbsp; When's the next 50k??!?<br /><br />-c</div><hr  style=" width: 100%; clear: both; visibility: hidden; "></hr>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Check out updated photos!]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/04/check-out-updated-photos.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/04/check-out-updated-photos.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:46:12 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trailstompers.com/1/post/2010/04/check-out-updated-photos.html</guid><description><![CDATA[Visit the TrailStompers photos page for new photos of beautiful Bay Area trail runs! [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div  class="paragraph" style=" text-align: left; ">Visit the TrailStompers <a href="http://www.trailstompers.com/photos.html">photos page</a> for new photos of beautiful Bay Area trail runs!<br /></div>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>

